Help In These Times Survive the Recession and Reach Its 33rd Year! Please Donate Today.

PrintDiscuss
Culture » June 6, 2006

Iraq on the Big Screen

By Michael Atkinson

Who should define what a war is “about”? By any ethical standard, that right should fall to the besieged—those who were waged upon, the people with the most corpses and the least to gain from combat.

Of course, in reality, an armed conflict’s character is limned by the powerful, in whose mitts the media will, as we all know, contort, grind and dilute matters of truth to fit the message of the campaign.

The cold facts about the Iraq ordeal—from lies and sword-rattling to tens of thousands of murdered civilians and an increasingly dedicated “insurgence” (a misapplied word carefully chosen by the think tanks, and reflexively used by nearly every public voice)—are visible from a modest height. But that’s not how media narratives would have us view this particular shitstorm. Instead, they frame the discussion around an array of other, smaller, more televisual issues: Are the U.S. soldiers being sufficiently armed, and adequately medicated? Are U.S. soldiers able to adjust to civilian life once they get home? How do U.S. soldiers “feel” about, well, everything?

TV being a crater, independent documentaries are sometimes our most hopeful opportunity for actually jamming our feet into those on-the-ground boots we’re always hearing about. But even this avenue, in even this stage of the Bush Administration’s dying power, is subject to ideological market controls. Take three new films, each of them shot in Iraq in 2004 and 2005, amidst the U.S.-led force’s efforts to simply deal with a native resistance that will not quit: Sean McAllister’s The Liberace of Baghdad (2005), Laura Poitras’s My Country, My Country (2006), and Deborah Scranton’s The War Tapes (2006).

While all three offer up an understanding of life in that war zone we’ll never get from embedded network telejournalists, the differences between the first two and the last are significant: Whereas McAllister’s and Poitras’s first-person films are intimate with Iraqi civilians and, necessarily therefore, scaldingly anti-occupation, Scranton’s audience-pleaser is assembled from footage soldiers shot themselves. The War Tapes is sometimes mordant and sometimes frightening, but it is only and wholly concerned with fresh-faced American operators among the inexplicably irate Arabs, who are merely scenery. Predictably, of the three movies, only Scranton’s is winning film festival awards and gathering steam toward a probable theatrical release in this country.

Not that urban theaters have hurt for progressive documentaries in the last six years, but voicing contempt for the Bush Administration is a safe haven compared to prioritizing Iraqi citizens over the invading American hordes. MacAllister’s remarkable film captures the affable BBC filmmaker’s bonding friendship with Samir Peter, a beloved, sophisticated Iraqi concert pianist living now in a Baghdad hotel basement and playing show tunes in the heavily guarded lobby for foreign journalists. Articulate, infectiously gregarious and ferociously unhealthy, Peter is every doc-maker’s dream subject; he takes McAllister for savvy daytrips through the city that are rarely secure and frequently terrifying. The occupation is seen from the inside, as explosions shake kitchen windows and even cultured families become conscientious about stocking their home with defensive firearms.

Poitras’s film is even meatier—without inserting herself into the frame, she makes the definitive nonfiction film about the war, always managing to be where platoons of U.S. reporters are afraid to go. She follows a Sunni activist-doctor around the Sunni Triangle in the year leading up to the 2005 elections, even accompanying him to the fences around Abu Ghraib: “We’re an occupied country with a puppet government,” Dr. Riyadh says to the pleading prisoners, “what do you expect?” Riding with the Kurds, listening to security contractors try to make sense out of chaos, sitting in Sunni living rooms as shells fall in the street—Poitras packs a month’s worth of visual experience into 90 minutes.

The War Tapes, which has already reaped a trophy at the 9/11-conscious Tribeca Film Festival, is a more Spielbergian experience—fiercely manipulative, ragingly effective but, in the end, reassuring. The indie equivalent of a yellow ribbon magnet, the film intercuts the soldiers’ digital footage with interviews with their families waiting for their return. You could be swept away by the working-class goodness and homespun heroism on display if you allow yourself. But your bubble ought to be tight, so as to avoid consideration, at least, of the mountains of Arab dead, and the mercenary self-regard of the participants, who care, as we’re meant to, only about getting home, not about where they’ve been, what they’ve done or why.

Michael Atkinson is the author, most recently, of “One Hundred Children Waiting for a Train.” He blogs at Zero For Conduct.

More information about Michael Atkinson
  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    If only our soldiers would stop murdering the innocent Iraqis, then the Sunnis and Shiites (and Kurds too) could live in peace. Praise be unto Allah.

    Posted by wolf on Jun 6, 2006 at 12:38 PM

    Jesus, Woof.  Ain’t it a drag when you can’t get the respect you know you deserve?  Go play in the traffic on some freeper site.  Someone there is bound to wrap an American flag around your sad, silly, sorry ass, and salute.

    Posted by Major Major on Jun 11, 2006 at 5:55 AM

    This article stars with a good example of what I like about liberals,

    Who should define what a war is about?

    They naively think life should be fair. (Well, OK, except when pushing their own agenda.)

    ...the U.S.-led forces efforts to simply deal with a native resistance that will not quit:

    ...voicing contempt for the Bush Administration is a safe haven compared to prioritizing Iraqi citizens over the invading American hordes.

    Is nothing unfair in these statements?

    simply deal with a native resistance (simple? native?)

    prioritizing Iraqi citizens over the invading American hordes (Iraqis only?) and you wish to prioritize them over American hordes? (Tell that to a grieving parent of one of our troops.)

    By the standard in the opening paragraph the right of decision-maker transfers with the body count. Of course then we would need to define a starting date, and who is on which side of the conflict (assuming no one switches mid-conflict).

    Hmmmm, can it be life (and Michael Atkinson) is fair to no one?

    Posted by whattheheck on Jun 13, 2006 at 1:16 PM

    Well, Wolfie

    it was a peaceful enough place BEFORE your troops went in to make home-movies about their heroism.

    WTH
    grieving parents are not only American. VERY few of THEM compared to the many many thousands of Iraqis.

    SORRY. Forgot those ones are not HUMAN.  They are just collateral damage, WE don’t do body-counts.

    IF you like WAR, at a safe distance like Wolfie, do not whinge about your casualties.

    Hmmmmmmmmmm. Definitely hypocritical, there.  They signed up for patriotism, a college education, or Adventure, whatever, and they PAID .

    It was a gamble, with yellow ribbons galore, and WTH and Wolfie cheering them on, from the sidelines, of course.

    Posted by frog on Jun 21, 2006 at 6:06 PM
  • register a new account »Posting Security

    To participate in our forums, please register for a free account.
Appeared in the June 2006 Issue
Also by Michael Atkinson
  • Moore Than You or Me
    Slacker Uprising offers nothing new, but it will be worth something if it affects November's electionPosted on November 5, 2008
  • Errol Morris’ Myopia
    Filmmaker Errol Morris has grown famous and revered as the pioneer of… morePosted on May 13, 2008
  • Iraq: Mismanagement or Mass Murder?
    No End in Sight explores how we got into Iraq and what screw-ups have made the situation spiral out of controlPosted on July 24, 2007
  • When We Were Psychos
    In 1969, news of the My Lai massacre hit the American press… morePosted on September 27, 2005
  • Look Out, It’s Real!
    "Look out, Haskell, it's real!," shouts a crew member, in the watershed… morePosted on June 3, 2005
IN THESE TIMES COMMUNITY MEMBERS